Author Archives: R.D. Walker

Introducing the Revo Republic

The Revo Republic is a round table. Anyone registered can post topics or replies. In effect, you all become co-bloggers.

This could be bug ridden yet so let’s call this a beta test. Please try it out. Make a post. This is a free-for-all. Post anything you like. We won’t find the bugs if you don’t take it for a spin.

Enter the Revo Republic

12 Comments

Time to start wrapping things up at the Revo

MadBrad and I started the Revo in November of 2007 in a fit of anger over what was going on in a different forum that we both frequented. We didn’t really know what the goal was to be other than having a place to vent without interference. I vaguely remember the idea that it would be a cross between National Review and National Lampoon: Smart but irreverent. And so it was.

In November of 2007, I didn’t have a Facebook account, an Instagram account or a Twitter account and you probably didn’t either. It was a great time to launch a standalone blog. In fact, it was the heyday of blogs and we rode that wave.

When we launched, Barack Obama was a name most Americans had not yet heard. That quickly changed and the site was critical of his crypto-Marxist, socially transformative, the-state-is-everything brand of politics. In the days of the Tea Party, the Revo had wings. We grew at one point to a steady 15,000 hits per day.

Those were fun days. We made new friends. We had meet-ups and we were all of likeminds. We stood for free speech, free markets, free trade, free people and free minds. We had a blast.

Things kind of turned south for us in 2016. The Trump candidacy tore us apart. I am still processing all the ways it did so. There is no way to easily summarize that split.

Some of us liked Trump for his policy on immigration and building a wall on the southern border. Nothing else about that man mattered.

Some of us wanted to defeat the left and that was everything. One writer called the election of 2016 the “Flight 97 Election”. We had to storm the cockpit even if that meant flying the plane right into the bedrock. Defeating Clinton was all that mattered.

Others, me included, felt that we were being offered a no win choice. Neither Clinton nor Trump offered what we were looking for in government. Tails we lose, heads they win.

The result was that the band of brothers was torn apart. The blog became schizophrenic with a split personality both supporting and opposing Trump and his agenda.

Readership plummeted. Commentary withered. Many of us began to feel like strangers in our own home. For me at least, blogging is no longer any fun.

I suppose one solution would to pick a side and run with it. For example, I could just get on the Trump bandwagon and make this yet another site of Hannity-like Trump cheerleading. Yeah, I am not going to do that.

I could ask my co-bloggers to make posts more in line with my thinking but, no, I am not going to do that either.

We could continue on in this schizophrenic way as a house divided against itself but that is no fun and if this isn’t fun, it is pointless.

The reality is that our time is up. Whatever was the purpose of the Real Revo, it is no longer operative. It isn’t 2007 anymore. Facebook clubs and so forth let anyone rant on the Internet and we get pulled into smaller and smaller subgroups. The days of standalone blogs are getting short.

Combine that reality with the ideological divisions here and, well, we are reaching the end of the line. I think we jumped the shark last summer at the Republican convention. There was nothing happy about Happy Days after the Fonz jumped the shark.

Therefore, it is time to start wrapping things up here. I don’t want to just pull the plug, however. I want to give people a chance to discuss. One thought is that I archive the blog and replace it with a discussion forum where anyone can post.

Whatever the case, it is time for a change.

Thoughts?

43 Comments

Onion Fact Checks: Anthony Scaramucci’s ‘New Yorker’ Interview

“I’m not Steve Bannon, I’m not trying to suck my own cock.”

TRUE: Scaramucci understands that true inner peace comes from accepting one’s flaws and only very rarely sucking oneself off.

Read it all. Seriously. It is funny as hell.

2 Comments

Obamacare repeal is repealed

It would appear that Obamacare is here to stay.

A months-long effort by Senate Republicans to pass health legislation collapsed early Friday after GOP Senator John McCain joined two of his colleagues to block a stripped-down Obamacare repeal bill.

“I regret that our efforts were simply not enough, this time,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on the Senate floor after the vote. “This is clearly a disappointing moment.”

“It’s time to move on,” he added after pulling the bill from the floor.

Okay, if we are going to have Obamacare, let’s make it work. The only way to do that is to give the individual mandate teeth. If everyone is entitled to receive care, then everyone must have insurance. If you are poor, you get subsidies. If you are not poor you must buy it or face the consequences.

It is the only way a system that allows anyone to receive care at emergency rooms and that requires policies to cover pre-existing conditions can possibly work.

11 Comments

Sessions is on the way out…

And the process of removing him, evidently, is slow humiliation.

Jeff Sessions was the first major political figure to endorse Donald Trump early in the primary season entitled (and entitles) him, at the least, to respectful consideration and professional courtesy by the Administration. Then Senator Sessions took quite a risk; his early endorsement of Trump triggered ridicule, even some ostracism. His colleagues wondered about his judgment. And then he gave up his seat in the U.S. Senate to accept this cabinet appointment. He is not some billionaire of staggering wealth who can simply return to the hedge fund after an Administration appointment goes sour.

I am old enough to remember when Trump supporters told us we should trust Trump because Sessions trusts him. Now some of those same commentators are telling us we shouldn’t trust Sessions because Trump doesn’t.

Frankly, I have never been a fan of Sessions’ brand of authoritarian conservatism. He is hostile to many things libertarians care about. His recent support for continuation of the travesty called civil asset forfeiture is an example.

That said, he doesn’t deserve the treatment he is getting. In fact, treating supporters this way is bad for Donald Trump and his Administration.

We have seen the manner in which Trump has treated his supporters. We watched as he treated Chris Christie like a S&M gimp, we saw the way he left Sean Spicer twisting in the wind, we heard him publicly refer to key advisor Steve Bannon as “just a guy who works for me” and now we watch the slow immolation of Jeff Sessions.

There is absolutely positively no way this treatment of subordinates isn’t already having a negative effect on the Administration. Getting the best and brightest talent to run the executive branch requires recruitment and that cannot be easy for this White House. After all, would you respond to this ad?

Wanted: Experienced professional to work in government office, to be berated daily, to be sabotaged by supervisor’s family and inner circle, to be sidelined and be publically humiliated before being ultimately thrown under the bus and fired in a very public way. Apply 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Treating staff this way will absolutely, positively result in a lack of loyalty and an extreme difficulty recruiting talent. It is impossible to believe that President Trump’s circle of loyal supporters in the administration isn’t small and shrinking. After all, the foundation of loyalty is reciprocity.

15 Comments

Trump and Putin share a laugh

Putin makes a joke about Trump and the media…

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin kicked off their highly anticipated one-one-one meeting by trading disparaging comments about the reporters gathered to cover it.

At a photo op before their private G20 summit meeting, the Russian President leaned in to Mr Trump, gestured to the journalists in the room, and asked: “These are the ones hurting you?”

“These are the ones. You’re right about that,” Mr Trump responded.

Then they had a shared chuckle.

Amusing. Of course in Russia the press doesn’t insult Putin. They know better. The consequences would be swift and serious.

I get the feeling that a lot of Americans who get a kick out of Trump’s war with the media think that the Russian way is a fine way to run things.

Doubtless, those folks will enjoy seeing the president and a neo-fascist despot share a laugh about the depredations of the free press.

More here.

3 Comments

The United States of Trade Protectionism

If the position of the Republican Party under Trump is to promote trade protectionism, then the Republican Party is indeed the Stupid Party.

Mr. Trump told the G-20 leaders in the closed-door meeting that they were “largely responsible” for the U.S.’s trade deficit, according to an official. China alone is responsible for about two thirds of the U.S. trade deficit. European Union leaders bluntly warned the president that they would retaliate against protectionist measures from Washington.

“The vast majority pointed out that we need free, but also fair, trade,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel said, seeking to reconcile the two positions. The U.S. has emphasized “fair” trade in contrast to past official language focusing on open markets.

“The discussions on this are very difficult,” Ms. Merkel said.

Disagreements deepened a G-20 schism that officials had flagged before the two-day gathering. Mr. Trump’s critical stance toward international initiatives largely isolated the U.S., while the remaining 19 pushed for more cooperation, according to people at the discussions.

The only fair trade is free trade. Any deviation from free, open trade is unfair trade.

Trade protectionism is indeed unfair in exactly the opposite of the manner Trump seems to think. When other countries sell the US products at low cost they harm themselves and benefit Americans. It is a direct transfer of wealth from, say, China to the US. The idea that it is anything else is childish sophistry. That is the trade policy of this administration: Childish sophistry.

More here.

2 Comments

Republicans may have to prop up Obamacare

If the Trumpcare fiasco isn’t resolved, the GOP may be forced to repair Obamacare.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Thursday that if his party fails to muster 50 votes for its plan to rewrite the Affordable Care Act, it will have no choice but to draft a more modest bill with Democrats to support the law’s existing insurance markets.

The remarks, made at a Rotary Club lunch in Glasgow, Ky., represent a significant shift for the veteran legislator. While he had raised the idea last week that Republicans may have to turn to Democrats if they cannot pass their own bill, his words mark the first time he has explicitly raised the prospect of shoring up the ACA.

“If my side is unable to agree on an adequate replacement, then some kind of action with regard to the private health insurance market must occur,” McConnell said. “No action is not an alternative. We’ve got the insurance markets imploding all over the country, including in this state.”

More here.

8 Comments

The Biggest Breaking News Story in Human History!

And Alex Jones has it!

ROBERT DAVID STEELE: This may strike your listeners as way out but we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20 year ride. So that once they get to Mars they have no alternative but to be slaves on the Mars colony. There’s all kinds of —

ALEX JONES (HOST): Look, I know that 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret and I’ve been told by high level NASA engineers that you have no idea, there is so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that, that’s the kind of thing media jumps on. But I know this: we see a bunch of mechanical wreckage on Mars and people say, “Oh look, it looks like mechanics.” They go, “Oh, you’re a conspiracy theorist.” Clearly they don’t want us looking into what is happening. Every time probes go over they turn them off.
[…]
JONES: Well I don’t know about Mars bases, but I know they’ve created massive, thousands of different types of chimeras that are alien lifeforms on this earth now.

4 Comments

Matthew Yglesias has a plan for America

I think he is serious.

Where to start? I guess the by the “Fed figuring it out” he means by expanding the money supply in order to create enough funds to pay this new minimum wage. That would pretty much have to happen since the alternative would be to fly the entire economy into the side of the mountain as every business in America went bankrupt.

So the federal minimum wage is $7.25. An increase to $150 would be an increase by about 20.7 times. I suppose the Fed could inflate the dollar by that amount and then every price would increase by 20.7 times and everybody would be right back where they are now. A value meal at McDonalds costs about $7.25 now (an hour’s wages) and in the new world it would be $150 (an hours wages). It is hard to see what is accomplished.

Well, a lot of debt would be wiped out. If you have a $10,000 car loan, it is a hell of a lot easier to pay that off at $150 an hour than at $7.25 an hour. That would seem like a benefit in the short term.

Of course nobody would ever make a loan to you again. One reason is that the lenders would be bankrupt by the inflationary theft of the Fed. Furthermore, no lender would ever again be willing to make a loan without an inflation rider. Interest rates forever more would make mafia dons blush.

In fact, it would be devastating to anyone with savings. That $100,000 you saved up by sacrificing for years? Yeah, it is now worth about 4,800 bucks in the new world. You won’t be able to buy a seven year old Corolla with that hundred grand. Screw you, huh?

So, loan equity wiped out. Savings wiped out. Loanable capital impossible to acquire. Hard currency difficult to acquire. Where have we seen this before?

Matt’s plan is right out of the Hugo Chavez playbook. Welcome to the United States of Venezuela.

1 Comment

CNN: “Nice little life you have there. Shame if something were to happen to it.”

Here is what happened…

A Reddit user made a fairly crappy GIF of Trump clotheslining CNN and put it on Twitter.

It would have been a big fat nothing except that the POTUS retweeted it.

This caused CNN to investigate the true identity of the GIF maker.

CNN contacted said GIF maker and, under threat of ruining his life, made him engage in a session of Marxist self-criticism and self-denunciation.

Then Ted Cruz got in the act.

Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz even suggested on Twitter that CNN could have a legal problem.

“Troubling. I assume CNN’s lawyers are examining GA § 16-8-16 Theft by extortion. If CNN constructively obtained the gif-maker’s IP…it’s a GA crime if they threatened to ‘Disseminate any information tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt, or ridicule….’” he wrote.

The Reddit user was behind the controversial GIF that Trump tweeted out Sunday — and that showed Trump wrestling an opponent (from his pre-politician days) with a CNN logo plastered over his face. The KFile group found the creator — user name “HanA**holeSolo” — by comparing information posted on Reddit to Facebook profiles. While CNN decided against publishing the user’s real name, the network appeared to attach a caveat to that decision.

So, once again CNN shoots itself in its own bullet ridden foot.

Look, there is right to anonymity for Internet trolls. If CNN would have simply published his name, not much would have come of that, what with the First Amendment and all. That is a free press.

What you can’t do, however, is threaten someone with ruin in order to get them to do what you want them to do. That is exactly what CNN did. How many times will CNN shoot itself in the foot? Turn in tomorrow.

7 Comments

A Tweet from the British Embassy in the US

In honor of American Independence Day.

I don’t care who you are, that is funny. 😀

4 Comments

Happy Independance Day

John Adams was thrilled by the signing of the Declaration of Independence. This was part of a letter he wrote to his wife Abigail that early July day in 1776.

I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more.

You will think me transported with Enthusiasm but I am not. — I am well aware of the Toil and Blood and Treasure, that it will cost Us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. — Yet through all the Gloom I can see the Rays of ravishing Light and Glory. I can see that the End is more than worth all the Means. And that Posterity will tryumph in that Days Transaction, even altho We should rue it, which I trust in God We shall not.

A greater proportion of Americans died in the Revolutionary War than any war other than that of 1861-1865. It was truly the first American civil war. Our republic was purchased at great expense in blood and treasure. We were given a great gift. Take a moment to reflect on that today… and then go celebrate with pomp and parade.

1 Comment

A Message from the President of the United States

1 Comment

A Message from the President of the United States

38 Comments

GOP Prepares to Re-Pass Obamacare

But don’t worry, they will call it a repeal.

Republican Senator Bob Corker said Thursday that he expects GOP leaders to scrap a provision in their health bill that would repeal a tax on investment income that affects high-income earners.

The Tennessee Republican said the decision to retain Obamacare’s 3.8 percent tax on net investment income would help Republicans boost subsidies for low-income people in the individual exchanges. Some other Republicans said they were willing to at least consider the idea.

“We are going to figure out a way, I believe, before Friday comes to greatly enhance the ability of lower income citizens to buy insurance on the exchange and at the same time my sense is that the 3.8 percent is going to go away,” Corker told reporters. “It’s not an acceptable proposition to have a bill that increases the burden on lower-income citizens and lessons the burden on wealthy citizens.”

Of course the Republicans are going to have to pass it for us to find out what is in it but we do know a few things.

~ No denial of pre-existing conditions, just like Obamacare.
~ Subsidies for those making less than 400% of the poverty level, just like Obamacare.
~ Subsidies for insurance companies, just like Obamacare.
~ All kinds of unrelated taxes, just like Obamacare.
~ Massive transfer of wealth, just like Obamacare.

Obamacare 2.0: Brought to you and made permanent by the GOP Congress and President Donald Trump.

3 Comments

Ten Commandments monument in Little Rock lasts one day

It has already been destroyed.

Less than a day after a monument of the Ten Commandments was installed outside the Arkansas State Capitol in Little Rock, it was destroyed when a man smashed a car into the stone.

Authorities say Michael T. Reed II drove a 2016 Dodge Dart into the 6,000-pound granite slab at about 4:47 a.m. local time on Wednesday.

Powell said the crash into the 6-foot-tall slab was no accident.

“This was deliberate. The individual drove down there and stopped. He was videoing it on his cellphone as he accelerated into the monument,” Powell said. “One of our Capitol Police officers was on patrol and witnessed it.”

Evidently this is the driver’s second act of crashing a car into a Ten Commandments monument.

6 Comments

Travel Ban 2.0

It starts today.

The Trump administration is expected Thursday to announce how it will implement its modified travel ban, following the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday lifting a stay on the executive order imposed by two lower courts.

The order bars travelers from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the U.S. for 90 days from when it takes effect, in order to allow the government to review its vetting procedures for people from those majority-Muslim nations. (The order originally included people from Iraq as well, but that nation was dropped after the administration realized its inclusion would hurt cooperation from the Baghdad government in the fight against ISIS.)

I have a question. The original travel ban was enacted on January 27 and was to be in place for 90 days. The purpose of the 90 day ban was to stop immigration from certain areas while a tighter vetting system was put in place.

January 27 was 153 days ago. Presumably, the tighter vetting practices were put in place as planned. What is the purpose for restarting the clock now?

5 Comments

You want people to die!!

2 Comments

Fake News

Heh.

The framed copy of Time magazine was hung up in at least five of President Trump’s clubs, from South Florida to Scotland. Filling the entire cover was a photo of Donald Trump.

“Donald Trump: The ‘Apprentice’ is a television smash!” the big headline said. Above the Time nameplate, there was another headline in all caps: “TRUMP IS HITTING ON ALL FRONTS . . . EVEN TV!”

This cover — dated March 1, 2009 — looks like an impressive memento from Trump’s pre-presidential career. To club members eating lunch, or golfers waiting for a pro-shop purchase, it seemed to be a signal that Trump had always been a man who mattered. Even when he was just a reality TV star, Trump was the kind of star who got a cover story in Time.

But that wasn’t true.

The Time cover is a fake.

That’s an impressive fake too what with the legit sub-headlines, the UPC code and everything. Covfefe Score: Perfect 10

9 Comments

Merkel: “Germany creates American jobs”

She is absolutely, positively correct.

Germany creates American jobs, Angela Merkel said Tuesday, in response to criticism from the White House over Germany exporting significantly more than it imports.

Speaking at the annual gathering of The Economic Council of the CDU, the business arm of Merkel’s conservative Christian Democrats, the chancellor mounted a strong defense of German industry, less than two weeks before she will see U.S. President Donald Trump at a G20 summit.

“The fact that we have 10 times as much direct investment from Germany in the United States than there’s American investment in Germany has, of course, … a strong effect on the many jobs we create [in the U.S.,]” Merkel said.

As I have said on this forum many, many times: A trade deficit is just another way of saying capital account surplus. Germany invests ten times more in the US than the US invests in Germany because the US runs a trade deficit with Germany.

If Trump’s misguided protectionism reduces the trade deficit with Germany, the result will be a decrease in German investment in the United States. This isn’t in question. It is certain.

Trump wants to increase foreign investment while reducing the deficit. This isn’t possible. This table shows that they are inversely related. Reduce one and you reduce the other.

If the table went back to 1933, you would see that the US had a trade surplus and a capital account deficit. That was the height of the Great Depression and not an economic situation for which we should be striving.

1 Comment

Czech nuke plant has potential interns compete in bikinis

CEZ Group unveiled the 10 photos of the high school graduates, which were taken at one of the cooling towers at its Temelin power plant, according to Deutsche Welle.

The power plant asked Facebook users to choose which bikini-clad woman was their favorite. The girl who won the most votes would be dubbed the “Bouncer of Energy” and awarded a 14-day internship at the company.

The competition was heavily criticized by Czech news media and social media.

I am glad to see Czech power plants take safety seriously. Hardhats should always be worn in that environment.

3 Comments

Senate Healthcare Bill on edge of collapse

Conservative Republicans won’t support it because it is little more than Obamacare Lite. Moderate Republicans won’t support it because, according to the CBO, it leaves too many uninsured. At least 50 of 52 Republicans must support it for it to pass.

The Senate Republican healthcare bill teetered on the brink of collapse by Tuesday morning as the Congressional Budget Office delivered a brutal assessment of its potential effects on coverage.

Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, a key moderate vote in the Republican conference, tweeted on Monday night that given its potential effects, she would not vote for the legislation — or even a motion to move it forward on the floor.

“I want to work w/ my GOP & Dem colleagues to fix the flaws in ACA. CBO analysis shows Senate bill won’t do it. I will vote no on mtp,” Collins tweeted Monday.

Other members of the GOP Senate conference also appear to be on the fence about voting for the legislation, many of them wavering after an analysis from the CBO showed the BCRA would reduce the number of insured Americans by 22 million in 2026 compared to the current baseline.

Allow me to quote Rudyard Kipling…

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But we’ve proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane.

More here.

7 Comments

SCOTUS: Public programs must be open to all

The Supreme Court says that denying church schools public benefits open to other private schools is unconstitutional.

In the church-state case, the court ruled 7-2 that it violates the Constitution’s protection of the free exercise of religion to
exclude churches from state programs with a secular intent — in this case, making playgrounds safer.

“The exclusion of Trinity Lutheran from a public benefit for which it is otherwise qualified, solely because it is a church, is odious to our Constitution … and cannot stand,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.

The church had ranked high enough in its application for the safety surface that it would have received the grant, but for the denial from the state’s natural resources department.

“The express discrimination against religious exercise here is not the denial of a grant, but rather the refusal to allow the church — solely because it is a church — to compete with secular organizations for a grant.”

Roberts was joined by the court’s conservatives as well as one of its liberals, Justice Elena Kagan. Another liberal, Justice Stephen G. Breyer, agreed with the outcome of the case.

A very good decision by this court.

More here.

Comments Off on SCOTUS: Public programs must be open to all

The Road to Hell is Paved with Leftists’ Good Intentions

No, you didn’t. You lost. A lot.

It turns out that Seattle’s minimum wage law is costing low-income workers 300% of what they are gaining. In other words, the City of Seattle has stuck a massive blow against the very people it supposedly wanted to assist.

Here is the Washington Post…

The costs to low-wage workers in Seattle outweighed the benefits by a ratio of three to one, according to the study, conducted by a group of economists at the University of Washington who were commissioned by the city. The study, published as a working paper Monday by the National Bureau of Economic Research, has not yet been peer reviewed.

On the whole, the study estimates, the average low-wage worker in the city lost $125 a month because of the hike in the minimum.

The paper’s conclusions contradict years of research on the minimum wage. Many past studies, by contrast, have found that the benefits of increases for low-wage workers exceed the costs in terms of reduced employment — often by a factor of four or five to one.

“This strikes me as a study that is likely to influence people,” said David Autor, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was not involved in the research. He called the work “very credible” and “sufficiently compelling in its design and statistical power that it can change minds.”

This, of course, was easily predictable by anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of economics and human behavior.

Question to ponder: Why do so many people who intuitively knew that artificially raising the cost of labor in the form of a minimum wage would cost more than it gained also believe that artificially increasing the cost of labor via trade protectionism won’t have an identical effect? Discuss.

3 Comments