Author Archives: notamobster

LRI Safety Wallet

The most important aspect of this video, during a traffic stop, occurs around the 1:35 mark.

Being a beligerent prick never did anyone any favors with the police. I’m just saying, be a dickhead at your own peril.


Argghhh!! Me Governin Party Be Comprised O’ Brigands & Ne’er-do-wells!

This is how f-ed up the world has become.


REYKJAVIK (Reuters) – Iceland’s anti-establishment Pirate Party is in a tight race to become the largest party in parliament after an election on Saturday called when the prime minister resigned as a result of the Panama Papers scandal.

The Pirates have been riding a wave of anger against the establishment in a country that was one of the hardest hit in the 2008 financial crisis when its banking system collapsed, hitting thousands of savers.

Polls put it in close second place to the Independence Party, currently the junior partner in the governing coalition.

It wants, among other things, to give asylum to U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden, accept the bitcoin virtual currency and clean up corruption.

The Pirates – founded less than four years ago as a protest movement against global copyright laws, and whose election campaign is partly crowdfunded – have 21 percent in a Morgunbladid poll published on Friday.

The Independence Party polled 22.5 percent.


War-Gaming Unlikely Outcomes Of The Election

Feel free to share your own ‘unlikely outcomes’ after you answer the question.


Let’s do a quick mental exercise of possible (however improbable) outcomes of the election. Apply the following to both sides of the political spectrum’s most passionate & vociferous factions. Both are capable of such, even if it’s unlikely.

We wake up on November 9th and Candidate wins the presidential election. Suddenly rumblings begin being heard from the opposing side of a call to more-decisive “action”. Next thing you know, attacks begin occurring around the country. The government allows the attacks to continue in an attempt to destabilize matters, further. Retaliations begin and before you know it, we’re no safer than Yazidis living in the Nineveh Province of Iraq.

Left & right are fighting each other, even as the government clamps down further on our civil liberties. The markets tank and bailouts begin. This only further-deepens the distrust and further-entrenches the self-serving political class.

People across the country who want nothing to do with the violence are begging for the new president to put an end to it. The nutjobs of the new president’s faction are screaming for the heads of those who they see as being at fault. The new president, to look presidential and prove that they are in control, clamps down in a harsh and excessively heavy-handed manner. The American people return to nervously-peaceful existence, but their rights have been further infringed and degraded by the now all-powerful tyrant-in-chief. A new precedent has been set and the doctrine of Rule By Executive Fiat is now a pillar of American governance.

My question to you is simple:

Do you have trouble envisioning either candidate as the Tyrant-In-Chief I mentioned above?


So, After The Election, What’s Next?

The American people have been clamoring for someone – anyone – to stand up and change the corrupt ways of our government. Unfortunately, in their zeal, they nominated two clowns to run the circus. The angst over military adventurism, regime change, the debauching of our currency, corporatist bailouts, and special-interest giveaways goes unanswered, yet again.

On both sides of the spectrum, I see the same caustic, fatalist rhetoric. It’s some variation of this refrain:

We need ______ to fix the problems. If we can’t get that, then destruction is the only option left.

I’m as guilty as anyone of this view, but I’ve gone a step further and openly called for the dissolution of the republic. I do not believe it can be fixed. I believe we have outgrown the size at which a representative republic is a viable form of government.

For the tards of the new left, the savior was Bernie Sanders. For the alt-right, it was the Orange Menace. In the end, the choice is a continuation of the same failed policies or a total question mark, both of whom I will begrudgingly admit have managed to steel the resolve of two (opposite but not-insignificant) demographics who despises the insular, self-serving political class in this country.

(As I’ve shown, I chose “Option C”, neither of the above. You don’t have to agree with me. I don’t care. I didn’t ask anyone else to choose for me and I wouldn’t presume to choose for them.)

Of much greater concern to me, is what comes next. When the global financial markets (inevitably) implode, who do those people clamor for? They clamor for a tyrant who will force their will upon the unrepentant political class. Note the tyrant bit. This is how history plays out, always & everywhere. If someone manages to harness the passions (and more importantly the power) of both these disaffected demographics, we will have officially paved our own road to ruin.


40 Million Russians Practice For Nuclear War

…or nuclear accidents, I mean, this is Russia we’re talking about.


Up to 40 million people were involved in the terrifying drill, organised following deteriorating relations between Russia and the West
Soldiers were seen carrying away ‘victims’ of a nuclear attack while civilians scampered into protective tents.

More than 200,000 emergency service staff are believed to have taken part in the drill.

Capital Moscow’s entire population of 12 million would be able to fit into refurbished underground shelters, Russian authorities confirmed.


Jabba The Hut Agrees That Trump Is Going To Win

And for the same reason..44c56c27-e51e-4fd9-872d-57b81950a807_zpsvxxdxppv.

Donald Trump came to the Detroit Economic Club and stood there in front of Ford Motor executives and said “if you close these factories as you’re planning to do in Detroit and build them in Mexico, I’m going to put a 35% tariff on those cars when you send them back and nobody’s going to buy them.” It was an amazing thing to see. No politician, Republican or Democrat, had ever said anything like that to these executives, and it was music to the ears of people in Michigan and Ohio and Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – the “Brexit” states.

They might be penniless, they might be homeless, they might be fucked over and fucked up it doesn’t matter, because it’s equalized on that day – a millionaire has the same number of votes as the person without a job: one. […]

They see that the elite who ruined their lives hate Trump. Corporate America hates Trump. Wall Street hates Trump. The career politicians hate Trump. The media hates Trump, after they loved him and created him, and now hate. Thank you media: the enemy of my enemy is who I’m voting for on November 8.

Yes, on November 8, you Joe Blow, Steve Blow, Bob Blow, Billy Blow, all the Blows get to go and blow up the whole goddamn system because it’s your right. Trump’s election is going to be the biggest fuck you ever recorded in human history and it will feel good.


Why I Don’t Believe In Eternal-Torment Hell

I would like to start out by apologizing for jacking Madbrad’s thread. That was not my intention. Bman asked a question that I and millions of others struggle(d) with, so I answered from my perspective. In short, my perspective is that what we know as “Hell” was a wholly-Roman insertian of Greek mythos into pure Christianity and doesn’t exist. I see it as one of the many dogmas we were warned against, ‘teaching for doctrines, the commandments of men.’ I believe that a thorough exegesis and proper hermeneutics bears out my view.

To be clear, I am not saying that there is no punishment for the wicked. The bible is clear that there will be, for it is “appointed unto all men, once to die, then the judgment”. The second death is not appointed unto all men, but it is death – not eternal torture. I don’t question judgment or punishment for being wicked, only the idea of eternal punishment for that wickedness.


I will lay out my case as simply as possible and let the discussion flow wherever it flows. I know this topic will likely get heated. All I ask is that we maintain a level of civility which keeps everyone engaged – i.e. don’t call people heretics, hypocrites, or other incendiary names. This is a reason-based discussion of different views. No one wants to put up with name-calling.

I would like for everyone (atheists & agnostics included) to feel comfortable and engage in this conversation, as it’s an important one to have.

What is Hell?

More below the fold…


A Fait Accompli



Clinton Campaign Caught Feeding Questions To Reporters?

I don’t know if that’s the case, but it looks bad. What do you think?


Springfield Launches A New Line Of Firearms

I am a Springfield man. My duty weapon as a cop, was the Springfield XDM .40 cal. It is called the Croatian workhorse. I can’t wait to see what they’ve come up with this time.


On Why I’m Befuddled By The Trump Support

Yesterday we had an esteemed guest. MOISAS stopped by to call us morally preening, heretical, ignorant cowards (and more – but, you get the gist). Many of his words are below. I would like to address what “set him off” since I strongly object to Donald J. Trump on the grounds that he lacks character. Take a moment and read MOISAS’ words and I’ll meet you toward the bottom:


The voting argument is somewhat moot: I don’t see voting or democracy in the Bible (excepting lots, which were divinely-controlled).

America is not a Christian country (that is, most of the people do not follow Scripture or attempt to follow Scripture, nor are the laws based on Scripture or attempt to follow Scripture). Democracy and the Constitution are products of the Enlightenment (which was a secular movement designed to get rid of God), so it boggles my mind that the idiots (not limited to ‘Christian’ conservatives) yammer about ‘God’s candidate’ (especially ironic considering most Christian conservatives said nothing about Glenn Beck’s messianic comments about Ted Cruz).

As much as I personally loathe Trump and Hillary, I’d prefer either of them to the Churchian conservative fools (who remind me more of the SJW Left at this point) who think themselves righteous for opposing Trump on moral grounds, yet said nothing about GWB or Romney ( heretics both).

Since you did ask where I come philosophically, I will answer:

1) True freedom is from Christ, not from a man-made document based on the secular Enlightenment (eg the Constitution).
2) As America is a secular society with a secular system of government, Christians will always be voting (if they do) for lesser of the evils.
3) Anyone who has voted or advocated for a politician (especially presidents) in the last 30 years has no business criticizing the moral character of Trump or anyone.
4) I suspect that most of the holy rollers’ opposing Trump is really a combination of either a) personal dislike, or b) jealousy over the fact that Trump has said one or two things that are Truth, while they lack the courage to do so (not the sincerity of his belief, rather just the fact he said them).

Vote Satan then; he loves liberty (except for worshiping God, but that’s a minor detail /s), and he certainly has great character. I may disagree with the Catholics, but they still use the Christian Bible (mostly). Ever hear of apologetics? I live in Mormon Land (+60%); my vote doesn’t matter. Clears your perspective. Sans Christ, nice gets you as far as debauchery with God.

I object to Donald Trump being our President because he lacks the moral character to lead our nation. I don’t care if it gets your panties in a wad, I believe we should insist upon a higher moral threshold for those we elect to lead our nation. Men who cheat on their wives; men who lie constantly, blatantly, and without compunction; men who ignore the oath to which they’ve bound their sacred honor should not be given the reins of power.

Their is no religious test in this country for the office of presidency. As you stated, the Constitution was a product of the enlightenment. Moral and ethical standards can – and should – exist without attaching religious dogma to it. From where one derives their standards, matters not, so long as society demands that those standards be met as a basis for determining eligibility to lead other men. Being of sound mind and good repute has long been required of men seeking acceptance into organizations or positions of leadership.

I attach no fundamental religious test or requirement to this demand. Atheist, Christian, Mormon…it matters not to me, because our nation allows for all beliefs while also protecting us from them. No man can implement his beliefs as a governing force in my life, so it doesn’t matter what his religion is. Here, Thomas Jefferson strikes at the very heart of what got MOISAS started:

Say nothing of my religion. It is known to God and myself alone. Its evidence before the world is to be sought in my life: if it has been honest and dutiful to society the religion which has regulated it cannot be a bad one.

So, what got him worked into a religious fervor?

I agree, but that is utterly befuddling to me. I just don’t get it. They couldn’t support a genuinely good man (by all accounts) because he was Mormon, but they’ll twist their logic into Gordian knots to justify voting for the orange menace. I don’t think I’ll ever understand.

Again, I must say that I’m befuddled. How can people NOT VOTE for the Mormon of solid repute but justify voting for a serial-adulterer of questionable-repute? You have the floor.


Did Hillary Divulge TS/SAP Information On Live Television?

But hey, Donald Trump said he isn’t sure he would accept the results of the election.


Hillary Clinton divulged Top Secret nuclear security intelligence to tens of millions of worldwide television audience viewers Wednesday night during the third presidential debate, according to high-ranking Department of Defense personnel.

Clinton, responding to opponent Donald Trump and a question posed by debate moderator Chris Wallace, boasted specific and “damaging” details about the United States’ nuclear response time to retaliate during a nuclear attack. Clinton said:

“But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.” –Hillary Clinton, National TV Appearance

“Secretary Clinton proved tonight she is unfit to be commander-in-chief,” a top-ranking DOD intelligence source said. “What she did compromises our national security. She is cavalier and reckless and in my opinion should be detained and questioned so we can unravel why she did what she did.”

According to Pentagon sources, the information Clinton disseminated publicly is Top Secret intelligence governed under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP) which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The specific details of the country’s nuclear response time discussed by Clinton, sources said, are only known by a handful of individuals outside top military brass, including the following “need-to-know” (NTK) officials:

  • President
  • Vice President
  • Secretary of State
  • Secretary of Defense
  • Secretary of Homeland Security
  • Attorney General
  • Director of National Intelligence
  • CIA Director
  • Deputy Secretary of State
  • Deputy Secretary of Defense
  • Special personnel designated solely by the President in writing

Sources said late Wednesday Clinton likely violated two different types of Dept. of Defense SAP protocols. Since nuclear response is part of the sensitive national plan for nuclear war operations, all of its schematics are covered under both “Intelligence SAPs” and “Operation and Support SAPs,” sources said. Both contain Top Secret information.

“Targeting options by ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missiles), air or sea, launch order, launch procedures and response are some of the most secretly guarded tenets of national security and nuclear war policy,” a Pentagon source said. “It’s truly incredible that (nuclear) response time as part of an ERO (Emergency Response Option) is now out there in the public domain to our adversaries.”



“Whenever you have allegations of those kind, that is a matter the entire country ought to take seriously.”

I wonder why the mainstream media can’t seem to find these things? /sarc

1 Comment

Talking Points: Trump Refuses To Honor Results Of Election

Kind of makes you feel like the system is colluding against a Trump presidency, doesn’t it?


This, from the same people who’ve been bitching & moaning for the past 16 years that Al Gore won in 2000. They’re still bitching about it.


This is why no one trusts progressives or the media.


Media Matters Attacks Joe Scarborough For Being Honest

How dare he stray from the plantation.

JOE SCARBOROUGH (CO-HOST): What was [Trump’s] exact quote?

MIKA BRZEZINSKI (CO-HOST): He said I will leave you in suspense.

WILLIE GEIST (CO-HOST): He said I will look at it at the time and keep you in suspense.

HAROLD FORD JR.: So that means he is not willing to say I will accept the outcome.

SCARBOROUGH: No, what that means is he will look at it at the time. I love everybody saying — I woke up to these screaming headlines saying, “Donald Trump will not respect election results.” He actually said I will look at it at the time. I’ll see.

FORD JR.: Has there ever been a presidential candidate to say that?

SCARBOROUGH: If there are voting irregularities, then any presidential candidate, anybody —

MIKE BARNICLE: What would you have said? What would your response be to that question?

SCARBOROUGH: I’d say yeah, I’ll certainly respect the outcome of the election. I of course would want to make sure that’s fair. I will want to make sure that it’s fair, it’s on the up and up.

BARNICLE: Well, he didn’t say that.

SCARBOROUGH: Yeah but you know what? This is an example the media got something they can absolutely freak out about and claim that he is an agent of Vladimir Putin and destroying democracy in America. And it’s just another example of the media having to find a little phrase and freak out. When as a Republican I have listened to Democrats talk about the only two times we won the White House in like 800 years that we stole both elections. I had to sit through Fahrenheit 911 and a lady was sobbing violently behind me on the Upper West Side about the election being stolen from George Bush and I patted her halfway through. I go, it’s all right, it’s all right, ma’am. It’s all right. It’s all a lie anyway. Democrats have been whining for 16 years, they are still writing articles about how Bush stole the elections in 2000 and 2004. So this holier than though attitude about, “this is the first time anyone has suggested that the election is not a sacrosanct process,” it’s a joke. So you guys bathe in that hypocrisy if you want to, I’d just like to hear how the debate went. Go ahead, bathe. 

Leave a comment

Numbers Just In: The Winner Is



WSJ: America, You Got Played

Hillary is as corrupt & inept as they come, but Donald Trump lacks the message discipline to hammer her on it.

Donald Trump probably is not helping his cause much with his conspiracy-mongering about a “rigged” election but Democrats should be thankful for small favors.

Mr. Trump lacks message discipline. Instead of scattershot claims that the race is being manipulated, wild conspiracy theories about ballot box-stuffing, which both parties and Americans of decency and goodwill strongly refute, he might be focusing laser-like on the…

Google trends shows that “is Trump trying to lose” has spiked this past week:


As I said, Donald Trump should be focusing on the issues that got him where he is, but instead he’s bumbling around about things being rigged because that gives him an out. It also makes him look pathetic & weak. If he’d just keep hammering on jobs, immigration, and the economy, he’d have a double-digit lead, but his ego won’t allow him to. Sadly, I agree with Obama. He needs to stop whining and start talking about what he can do to fix the country. He can mention that we will have a full-investigation into the FBI & White House’s handling of crooked Hillary’s emails, but he needs to stick to the issues that matter to Americans.


1 Comment

CNN Loses Feed Of Folks Who Criticize HRC

Complete coincidence, I’m sure.

Seemed to be fine til she started talking about the bad stuff, then the magic technical difficulties appear:

Leave a comment

Hillary & BJ’s Fixer Comes Forward To Enquirer!

The Nat’l Enquirer is likely the only organization who would take the story. Everyone else is afraid of being blacklisted & targeted for retribution by the megalomaniac, when she’s elected. The fixer promises 24 years of documents, notes, & journals.

Hillary Clinton is a secret sex freak who paid fixers to set up illicit romps with both men AND women!

That’s the blockbuster revelation from a former Clinton family operative who is sensationally breaking ranks with his one-time bosses to speak to The National ENQUIRER in a bombshell 9-page cover story — on newsstands Wednesday.

“I arranged a meeting for Hillary and a woman in an exclusive Beverly Hills hotel,” the man, who was hired by the Clintons, via a Hollywood executive, to cover up their scandals, told The ENQUIRER.

“She had come to the studio to see the filming of a movie in 1994.”

“While I was there, I helped her slip out of a back exit for a one-on-one session with the other woman. It was made to look casual, leaving quietly [rather] that being caught up in the melee … but really it was for something presumably more sordid.”

What’s more, it wasn’t just Hillary’s flings with women that the shadowy Mr. Fix It helped to orchestrate!

Hillary’s former bagman finally confessed to The ENQUIRER just how he helped her to cover up her affair with married lover Vince Foster, too!

The shadowy figure — who provided PROOF of his employment for the Clintons — also revealed 12 fixes he covered-up, including:

PHOTOS: Leaked Emails Detail Hillary Clinton’s Desperate Health Crisis Cover-Ups

In the bombshell exposé, The ENQUIRER will reveal the fixer’s dossier of smoking gun proof, including 24-years of documents, notes, and journals.


FBI Railroads General To Fix It’s Image

These people are hopelessly out-of-touch. They’re doing damage control (after smearing the reputation of the DOJ & FBI by failing justice with Clinton case) by over-charging a General for much less-serious infractions.

Trust in the American government has cratered:


Congressional approval is barely in the double-digits, but you know who the public does trust? The military.


Only 3 senior leadership personnel have been charged under Obama for leaking classified information. This one is his “favorite General”.

The FBI’s handling of the case stands in stark contrast to its treatment of Hillary Clinton and retired General David Petraeus — and it reeks of political considerations.

Monday marked a stunning fall from grace for Cartwright, the man once known as “Obama’s favorite general,” who pleaded guilty to the felony charge of lying to the FBI during its investigation into the leaking of classified information about covert operations against Iran to two journalists. His lawyer Greg Craig said in a statement that Cartwright spoke with David Sanger of the New York Times and Dan Klaidman of Newsweek as a confirming source for stories they had already reported, in an effort to prevent the publication of harmful national security secrets.

Under his plea deal, Cartwright could face up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Last year, Petraeus cut a deal with the Justice Department after admitting he had lied to the FBI and passed hundreds of highly classified documents to his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. He pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor of mishandling classified information and was sentenced to two years probation and a $100,000 fine.

Clinton was not charged at all for what FBI Director James B. Comey called “extremely careless” handling of “very sensitive, highly classified information.” Comey said that although there was “evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,” the FBI’s judgment was that no reasonable prosecutor would have filed charges against Clinton or her associates.



Can You Hear The War Drums?

Can you hear the war drums?

I can’t help but wonder why our president continues to aggressively posture our nation against Russia.

Even the vice president, Slow Joe, threatened Russia just last week. This threat was a Cyber attack, one that would have the most impact.

So, why is it that our esteemed president has chosen the time just before the election?

Is it possible that there’s something more Sinister at play or is it just normal geopolitics and wanting to defeat Isis?

Likewise, why is it that the American Media can only seem to focus on Shit Show 2016?

Why do they completely ignore the ever-increasing threat of a war with Russia?

The Russian people are being advised to find the closest nuclear fallout shelter and being asked if they are prepared for war with United States…but our media and our government are largely silent?


Am I the only one hearing president kickass as he beats the war drums? Am I over estimating the significance? What say you?


Unaltered Photo

I stopped by the library to pick up a few books and found this stack of books exactly as you see it. Happy Hump Day!


Sorry for using the word “hump” in a post about Hillary Clinton.

Leave a comment

Rigging The Election Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

The second of many promised videos; each one worse than it’s predecessors. James O’Keefe is a hero and a patriot in the truest sense of the word.


Goal Seeking ‘Science’: When Observable Data Doesn’t Fit The Narrative

…change the metric…

Whether they admit it out loud or not, many global warming alarmists want more destructive weather events to validate their assumptions. But what happens when they can’t get their “dirty weather,” as Al Gore calls it? Then they’ll just have define down what a disaster is.

Eleven years ago, Gore swore that “the science is extremely clear now.” Global warming was “magnifying” the “destructive power” of the “average hurricane,”[…]

Strain though they might, they’re not convincing anyone who isn’t already riding along on the climate-change disaster wagon. And they know they’re not. So the climate-hysteria movement needs a new approach[…]

After Matthew dumped more than 17 inches of rain in North Carolina, science editor Andrew Freedman wrote in Mashable that “it’s time to face the fact that the way we measure hurricanes and communicate their likely impacts is seriously flawed. ”

“We need a new hurricane intensity metric,” he said, “that more accurately reflects a storm’s potential to cause death and destruction well inland.”

The current measure is the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale, which, according to the National Hurricane Center, provides “a 1 to 5 rating based on a hurricane’s sustained wind speed.” But if the intensity of a storm is redefined by using other criteria, such as rainfall and storm surge flooding, the game changes.

“So with a new metric, warmists can declare every storm ‘unprecedented’ and a new ‘record,’ ” says Marc Morano, publisher of Climate Depot and producer of “Climate Hustle,” a movie that “takes a skeptical look at global warming.”


This is how they do it, over-and-over-and-over-again. They tell us that the only solution to _________, is to decrease liberty and increase government intrusion into our lives. Then, when _______ doesn’t pan out, they change the way it’s measured, so they can prove the initial claim, or they change the name of the problem to fit and evolving theory. Incidentally, it’s also why no one buys their BS to begin with.


Rigging The Election Video I: Inciting Violence At Trump Rallies

Can’t embed from my phone. YOU MAY WATCH THIS VIDEO & MAKE IT FAMOUS!