Who Said It?

Who said it?

1) “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
A. Karl Marx B. Adolph Hitler C. Joseph Stalin D. Barack Obama E. None of the above

2) “It’s time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few…… And to replace it with shared responsibility, for shared prosperity.”
A. Lenin B. Mussolini C. Idi Amin D. Barack Obama E. None of the above

3) “(We)…..can’t just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.”
A. Nikita Khrushev B. Josef Goebbels C. Boris Yeltsin D. Barack Obama E. None of the above

4) “We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own … in order to create this common ground.”
A. Mao Tse Dung B. Hugo Chavez C. Kim Jong Il D. Barack Obama E. None of the above

5) “I certainly think the free-market has failed.”
A. Karl Marx B. Lenin C. Molotov D. Barack Obama E. None of the above

6) “I think it’s time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in
(the) entire economy that they are being watched.”
A. Pinochet B. Milosevic C. Saddam Hussein D. Barack Obama E. None of the above

Answers Below

(1) E. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
(2) E. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
(3) E. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
(4) E. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
(5) E. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton
(6) E. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton

bloody bitch

From Wirecutter

Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Who Said It?

  1. Locke n Load says:

    I like this one better than the Stevens pic. Benghazi, and all of this, is gonna get ‘the hand’ by the press anyhow. Think ANY of them will suddenly decide to report on something they didn’t report on when it happened?
    Whoever gets selected by the Establishment will be told to not insult her. She’ll get the protected species treatment, just like Obama. And on the off chance someone with balls does run against her? She’ll pull out the crocodile tears and play victim. I hate that woman with a passion but America is absolutely FULL of morons with ZERO understanding of what is going on around them. They probably think Benghazi is a Japanese steakhouse.
    I’ve about lost hope. We’re an Idiocracy

  2. Rockheim says:

    ROFL.. Of course SNOPES has this complete list.. And even though they’d love to run cover for her.. The best they can come up with is…. “Mixed” for the accuracy of it.

    It’s all about “context”.. Sure.. Of course she actually said all those things.. But you’re missing the context..

    Because liberals will always fall all over themselves when it comes to taking the “nuance” and “context” of Conservative statements and positions into account..

  3. DOWNTOWN says:

    Lord help us if this Bitch becomes our next Pres. But the sad truth is to many numbnuts will vote for her because they think it would be cool to have a woman pres. Same reason they voted for Obama, cool to have a black pres. Uneducated voters will be our downfall. Voting for coolness like they were voting for class president in high school. OMG, this thought just ran thru my mind, a Clinton/Pelosi ticket !!

  4. Z says:

    Michelle promises she has no interest in a future in politics

  5. trebor snoyl says:

    What Obama has left uncompleted in the ruination of this country, Hillary will finish if elected President.

  6. messup says:

    Thought a different take on this matter would help, here goes:
    O.K. let’s pit Milton Friedman against John Kenneth Galbraith. Milton Friedman of the Chicago School of Economics and John Kenneth Galbraith of the Fabian Socialist East Coast schools of economics. Now, let’s look at Milton Friedman’s result in freeing-up Chile’s economy. By applying “free market” economic theories to a moribund dictatorship…Chile’s economy was the world envy. Chile’s subsequent “falls from grace” and current stagnation are not fruits of what “laissez-faire”economics can do for capitalism when left unfettered and untrammeled with government rules and regulations but, YES! the direct result of Latin American: 1)greed. 2)power and 3)rampant corruption. Exactly what’s facing America today (Obama, Congress and SCOTUS, anyone?).
    Lastly, where has John Kenneth Galbraith’s most recent successes occurred? Certainly not USA. How’s about in Canada? Nope, was discarded there a long time ago. See, Keynesian economics (professed by Mr. Galbraith) has always been anathema to any world economy, let alone USA’s. Need proof? Just look at USA’s 2007 and 2013 time periods for proof. How’s that QEIII working for you? And Obamacare? And Government takeover of GM? OH! And the student loan debacle now higher than all credit card balances ever…$1.2 trillion dollars (Salliemae). Tried buying a home lately(FreddieMac)? Renewable energy? OH! Couldn’t qualify for either? Hummm! Wonder why! Think it could have anything to do with total market distortions and governments constant takeover of all “Laissez-faire” economics in the USA just like what occurred in Chile? NAH! Government intervention in the private sector is the problem (Economics 101)…see, government never, ever produced a profit, only waste, fraud (EBT cards, anyone) and dependency (the “collective” syndrome). Pray. Amen. Join a Tea Party Urgently!.God Bless America. Liberty Amendments is the way, organize, NOW!

  7. Uke says:

    Americans have devolved. They will vote for something “new” just so they can feel like they were a part of something special, at the ground floor, because they have so reduced the bar for what is considered actual accomplishment. It’s vicarious accomplishment at best, and hanger-on (or even parasitic) accomplishment at worst.

    Don’t believe me? Go ahead and count the number of blog posts you see or have seen where the OP makes a statement or announcement, after which point various commenters do nothing more than say “first” or “second.”

    That’s it. No contribution, no accomplishment… but that person has nonetheless planted his flag. Combine this with the fact that Americans have also been conditioned to feel that tolerance is among the highest virtues, and we have a condition where we have become very susceptible to the cult of personality/identity.

    So Americans will absolutely gobble up the “first black president.” Then the “first female president,” then the “first black female president,” then the “first openly gay president,” then the “first openly gay black president,” until down the road we’re electing the “first openly gay black transgendered handicapped ambidextrous midget with three nipples.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *