The doublethink of the Obamanation

doublethink

Cap and trade legislation is designed to increase costs of energy production in the United States. The Democrats know this and, this blog has posted audio of Obama saying that his cap and trade plan “will necessarily cause electric rates to skyrocket.” If you increase the costs of energy, you increase the cost of production which, in turn, increases the cost of goods. A basic understanding of simple price elasticity of demand would tell anyone that as prices increase, quantity demanded falls. Less demand means less jobs. This is beyond dispute. Yet Obama said that cap and trade is a jobs bill. Before the vote in the House, Pelosi said the job killing bill is about “jobs, jobs, jobs.”

The public government option for health care reform was designed to extend government health care services to tens of millions of Americans who currently don’t have coverage. It was to be modeled after Medicare which as an annual budget about 1,000% greater than was projected for this period when it was created in in the 1960s. The government option was to use tax payer dollars to subsidize health care services for more than 40 million people. Yet Obama has told Americans over and over that the creation of a government option for health care will reduce costs.

In February of this year Obama and the Democrats, in a matter of days, force through the greatest pork spending bill in human history. Called a stimulus bill, it was designed more to be a massive wish list of liberal pet projects. It was pushed through via fear mongering and as debt spending, increased the national debt to levels never before seen. This was followed by the passage of and signing by Obama of a comparably huge omnibus bill. I few weeks later, Obama sited the spending of the previous administration as he demanded that Congress pass a pay-as-you go bill. “It is no coincidence that this rule was in place when we moved from record deficits to record surpluses in the 1990s — and that when this rule was abandoned, we returned to record deficits that doubled the national debt,” Obama said, flanked at the White House by supportive Democratic lawmakers.

The Democrats, supported by Obama, have proposed changing rules associated with how unions are allowed to organize workers in the United States. Under the existing law today, workers have a chance to vote for or against unionization in a private-ballot election that is federally supervised. Democrats have proposed eliminating the private-ballot and requiring that votes be made public. By forcing workers to sign a card in public, the Democratic plan opens the door to intimidation and coercion. The Democrats have named this bill the “Employee Free Choice Act.”

Obama and the Democrats are masters of the Orwellian practice of making claims that are boldly and explicit the opposite of reality. They do it over and over and without any evidence of embarrassment. They seem to even believe what they say. In the novel 1984, Orwell called this “doublethink.”

The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them….To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies — all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.

The beauty of doublethink, you see, is that it also allows the speaker to believe that he is doing good even if, on some other level, he knows he is causing harm. There is no truth, there are no lies, it is all possible with doublethink and it is all possible in Obama’s New Order.


5 Responses
  1. BaconNeggs :

    Date: October 1, 2009

    This ability to tell bold face lies while knowing the truth is something lawyers routinely do.

    Morality is over ruled by legal doublethink and doubletalk.

    It is no surprise that most professional politicians are trained lawyers, who have perfected the ability to tell lies with skill.

    Sophistry was once punishable by death in Ancient Greece as Socrates found out. Its a pity we dont have this solution for dealing with these latter day corrupting liars.

  2. MadBrad :

    Date: October 1, 2009

    They are given over to a depraved mind. We will be given over to a depraved society if we agree to allow these people to control our lives. The sooner we seperate ourselves from this human filth the better off we will be. They will come to their own destruction of their own accord. Woe be unto the dumbasses who march according to the beat of their drum.

  3. R.D. Walker :

    Date: October 1, 2009

    What Gorbachev and Obama have in common (besides both being Marxists)…

    Yet they do have one major thing in common, and that is the belief that, regardless of what the ruler does, the polity he rules must necessarily continue. This is perhaps the most essential, if seldom acknowledged, insight of the post-modern “liberal” mind: that if you take the pillars away, the roof will continue to hover in the air.

    Gorbachev seemed to assume, right up to the fall of the Berlin Wall and then beyond it, that his Communist Party would recover from any temporary setbacks, and that the long-term effects of his glasnost and perestroika could only be to make it bigger and stronger.

    There is a corollary of this largely unspoken assumption: that no matter what you do to one part of a machine, the rest of the machine will continue to function normally.

    A variant of this is the frequently expressed denial of the law of unintended consequences: the belief that, if the effect you intend is good, the actual effect must be similarly happy.

    Very small children, the mad, and certain extinct primitive tribes, have shared in this belief system, but only the fully college-educated liberal has the vocabulary to make it sound plausible.

    With an incredible rapidity, America’s status as the world’s pre-eminent superpower is now passing away. This is a function both of the nearly systematic abandonment of U.S. interests and allies overseas, with metastasizing debt and bureaucracy on the home front.

    And while I think the U.S. has the structural fortitude to survive the Obama presidency, it will be a much-diminished country that emerges from the “new physics” of hope and change.

  4. R.D. Walker :

    Date: October 1, 2009

    More doublethink…

    Obama’s campaign promise to not raise taxes on households making less than $250,000 a year was always considered a joke here inside the Beltway. It’s the economic “consensus” — and this was true even before the financial meltdown and recession — that rising entitlement costs would eventually mean a higher tax burden for the American people.

    Maybe it was a joke inside the campaign, too. Since being elected, Obama has raised cigarette taxes and has advocated raising healthcare taxes, energy and small business taxes, in addition to corporate taxes. What’s more, economic advisers like Larry Summers seem eager to get rid of all the Bush tax cuts, not just those on so-called wealthy Americans.

  5. R.D. Walker :

    Date: October 1, 2009

    Hardcore, doublethink from that massive Cleavland Steamer, Michael Moore…

    Millionaire Filmmaker Michael Moore: ‘Capitalism Did Nothing For Me’
    Thursday, October 01, 2009

    (CNSNews.com) — Documentary film director Michael Moore, who has become a millionaire thanks to the profits from his movies, told CNSNews.com that “capitalism did nothing” for him.

    CNSNews.com spoke with Moore on the red carpet at the Uptown Theatre in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday night before the premiere of his upcoming documentary, “Capitalism: A Love Story.”

    CNSNews.com asked: “Critics may say, when they see this movie, Michael Moore has amassed a fortune of over $50 million, some have said and –”

    Moore said: “Really? Are you kidding me? Seriously? Wow. Where did it go?”

    CNSNews.com then asked Moore: “Critics would say he’s [Moore] been very successful under a capitalist system. How would you justify making a movie where you paint capitalism as evil?”

    Moore said: “Well, capitalism did nothing for me, starting with my first film.”

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comments are open and generally unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Real Revo. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by The Real Revo. Do Not spam this site. To help reduce spam, comments containing hyperlinks must be approved prior to appearing on the site and may be delayed. There is no need to resubmit your comment.