Obama is surrounded with angry people

Angry

I read that cretin Bill Maher’s article this morning and he is disappointed in Obama. Not because Obama’s policies are based on crushing statism and crypto-Marxist economic destruction. He is angry because Obama is too much like Bush and has not sufficiently advanced a progressive/socialist/suicidal agenda. Don’t bother to read the article. There is nothing there other than disappointment that Obama – who he still loves – hasn’t done more to fulfill his destiny as a Leninist vanguard of the proletariat. What is instructive, however, is a look at the anti-Obama vitriol in the comments section. Here is a sampling with spelling and grammatical errors intact.


We never even asked this phony plant if he was ‘working for the man’, working for the Empire. Shame on us.

As the old saying goes, “If you fool me once about an imperialist president, shame on you. But if you fool me, a dozen times, about an imperial president — shame on all of us”.

I feel so betrayed when I see Obama on television. First of all, he has done nothing about all the Bush crimes that were committed. Nothing. He just wants to, as he puts it, look forward and put it in the past. So he has deprived the American people of having closure with a president that continually lied to us and committed many attrosities and desimated our Constitution. When I see Obama on TV he seems to give the impression that he is some great president or something. People are suffering out here. Nothing is being done.

We hear that Obama is an intelligent Harvard graduate, a Constitutional lawyer, a former community organizer, etc. Yet his policies are identical to those of George W. Bush’s policies. Are those the actions of an intelligent person?

I will not vote for Barack Obama again if we do not get single-payer health care. I loathe Republicans, but why reward Democrats for acting like them?

Did he get what he wanted when he became the first black President of the USA? Is Michele a Nancy Regan? The one ruling the roost? Does Michelle tell Barack every night, “Don’t you dare get your self shot and killed and leave me and the girls alone for the rest of our lives.” At least Ronnie had the excuse of Alzheimer’s. What’s Barack’s excuse? “I can’t talk tough to anyone but a chick on the campaign trail? How in the heck did the man go from hard line and eloquence on the campaign trail, to dud?

Smart. Talented. What does that mean? It means nothing in the face of Obama’s corrupt character – the lying, vain, strutting, self-satisfied, golfing yuppie blowing the hot, vapid air of a high school valedictorian. So, he fooled Maher as well. And Gore Vidal. And millions of us not as brilliant. But not again. Vote third party in ’012.

Obama is a sap. He tried for bipartisanship, not realizing that the Republicans are interested in no such thing. Hillary Clinton is tougher. I cannot imagine her getting rolled in this way.

Obama – the true manchurian candidate – for the republicans…… at least we now know where the democrats loyality is….. and it’s not with the working class or on the side of social justice…..

at the exact time we could have had REAL change Obama has proven what a bunch of sell-outs the democrats are…..I know many demos who have vowed to NEVER vote democrat again if things don’t change and soon.

I am so disappointed with Obama…he is just another corporate hack. People should ask for their donation money back.

They go on in that vein. The people who made these comments are not our friends, but they will help undermine the Obamanation. The base is angry and the opposition is energized. Obama is encircled with anger. How long until he takes up smoking again?


10 Responses
  1. Bman :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    I like to go to the SFGate website and stir the pot with comments on articles. Ive noticed that the percentage of liberal posting their comments has dropped significantly while more conservative/ common sense comments have increased. Even in the liberal hellhole of the SF area, people seem to be fed up.

  2. Bman :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    As a matter of fact, looking at the San Fransick-o Chronicle now…very hard pressed to find any articles about any republican election victories, but no problem finding this headline; “Democrat wins house seat in heavily GOP area”.

  3. Notamobster :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    “…his policies are identical to those of George W. Bush’s policies. Are those the actions of an intelligent person?”

    Umm… yes! The intelligent man would do what his bosses tell him to do, so that he can continue a lead free diet. The globalists run shit. International bankers run shit! MaoBama is their puppet, continuing the inexorable march to global serfdom.

    What these globalists underestmated, as we are now seeing, is the inimitable spirit of the Americans they so love to hate!

    I love this country for all the reasons the euro-douches hate us!!!

  4. R.D. Walker :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    Bman: The MSM would rather not talk about last night. Click to enlarge this screen shot of the CNN website this morning…

    cnnsite

  5. Bman :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    Exactly RD. The San Francisco “Chronic” has a front page headline having to do with the study of great white sharks. it just makes my blood boil

  6. notamobster :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    google news nothing

  7. Bman :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    Here’s a little something from the AP story titled: “White House: Tuesday’s GOP wins not about Obama”

    “White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters Wednesday that voters went to the polls in Virginia and New Jersey to work through “very local issues that didn’t involve the president.” The presidential spokesman said voters were concerned about the economy.”

    I would certainly say that Obama was involved. He campaigned for these guys for christ sake! No doubt, if the democrats would have won, the headline would have been much different and Obama would get much credit.

  8. joe buzz :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    Rest assured that had a Democrat won in VA or NJ it would have been all about Obama.

  9. BaconNeggs :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    Bill Maher seems hard to satisfy considering all Obama have done to coil a massive socialist snake around America’s throat. Perhaps some goose stepping “yes we can” Obama brown shirts would cheer Bill up a bit, eh.

    Another darling of Obama, Scott Ritter, also wrote an article slamming Obama for “caving” to McCrystal and the failed Bush policy in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Scott Ritter dismisses “the surge” in Iraq, can see no improvement from the military campaign and concludes that Afghanistan is a grave yard for any military and therefore like Vietnam, Obama should show the leadership he promised and pull the US military out of Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Bill sees not enough Socialism and wants more faster and harder, while Scott sees not enough success from the surge and wants to surrender/quit.

    However, I bet a lot of brave people in the Military who have sent many Jihadist to their grave, and still stuck out on the battlefield waiting on lame Obama to stop dithering and give them the men and equipment to win this neccessary war, may agree with Bill and Scott, that Obama is absolutley useless, but for totally opposing reasons.

  10. Tatersalad :

    Date: November 4, 2009

    ….and this is just the beginning with the healthcare fiasco:

    http://www.lifeandhealthinsurancenews.com/News/2009/11/Pages/HR-3962-biofuels.aspx?nul

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comments are open and generally unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Real Revo. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by The Real Revo. Do Not spam this site. To help reduce spam, comments containing hyperlinks must be approved prior to appearing on the site and may be delayed. There is no need to resubmit your comment.