I really tire of these religious litms tests regarding leftist ideas. Have you ever noticed how the left will say things like:
“Would you a least concede that co2 is the leading cause of climate change?” or other such benchmarks from which they can build their case? i.e.
“Killing babies is wrong.”
“What about in cases of rape or incest?” (so few that it’s statistically irrelevant).
Or with ‘assault weapons’ which are used in very few murders, comparatively, etc. I’m glad Trump’s EPA is re-introducing science to the scientific community.
“I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and there’s tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact, so no, I would not agree that it’s a primary contributor to the global warming that we see ,” he told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”
“But we don’t know that yet. … We need to continue the debate and continue the review and the analysis.”
Pruitt also called the Paris Agreement, an international accord aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change, “a bad deal.” He said it puts the United States on a different playing field than developing countries like China and India.
“I happen to think the Paris accord, the Paris treaty, or the Paris Agreement, if you will, should have been treated as a treaty, should have gone through senate confirmation. That’s a concern,” he said.
The Paris Agreement was negotiated by the State Department, and future adherence to U.S. commitments made under Obama will be guided by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson