The Sabotage of Wikipedia

Wikipedia is the most read source of information in the world.  If you are looking for non-controversial information – for example, source of the Nile or the distance to the moon - it is a great resource.  If, on the other hand, you want to find information on a topic of controversy or one in which vested interests have disputed claims, it is just about worthless.   It is of no value, for example, in finding unbiased information about climatology or global warming.  The global warm-mongers control and dominate the parts of the sites dealing with climate.

One person in the nine-member Realclimate.orgteam — U.K. scientist and Green Party activist William Connolley — would take on particularly crucial duties. Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known -Wikipedia. Starting in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band members were beginning to gel, Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site. He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling. On Feb. 14, he began to erase the Little Ice Age; on Aug. 11, the Medieval Warm Period. In October, he turned his attention to the hockey stick graph. He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band. Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world’s most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets, followed by others that the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period.

All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions. Acolytes whose writing conformed to Connolley’s global warming views, in contrast, were rewarded with Wikipedia’s blessings. In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement.

It is a testimony to the outrageousness of the warmists claims that, even with a great propaganda machine at their disposal, more and more people are realizing that the warm-mongers have been propagating the greatest scientific hoax in history.

Read it all here.


One Response
  1. Jim 22 :

    Date: December 20, 2009

    Wikipedia, Snopes, etc. We cannot rely on any of them to be objective. We must do our own research.

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comments are open and generally unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Real Revo. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by The Real Revo. Do Not spam this site. To help reduce spam, comments containing hyperlinks must be approved prior to appearing on the site and may be delayed. There is no need to resubmit your comment.