“Are you with us or the regime?”

Let’s role play.

You are the president of the United States. You are the sixth president to address the issue of an Islamic Republic that has declared itself an enemy of America and an enemy of America’s allies. The Islamic Republic has openly threatened to wipe Israel off of the map.

This nation is openly and aggressively developing a nuclear weapon capability. Nothing seems to dissuade them from this path. Neither the previous administration’s threats nor your administration’s attempts at diplomatic engagement makes the slightest difference in their headlong weapons development program.

Israel will not allow a second Holocaust under any circumstances. At some point, Israel will be forced to attack the Islamic Republic. This will cause a wider war and will certainly cause the price of oil to skyrocket. In the midst of a world-wide recession, the last thing that is needed is an oil shortage.

Your options seem limited but there is one ray of hope. There is a democracy movement in the Islamic Republic. These aren’t people calling for fair elections. These are people calling for revolution. If they were to succeed, there is a real chance they would ally themselves with the United States and abandon the nuclear weapons program.

You can either support their movement or continue to engage with the leaders of the Islamic regime. The latter option, of course, lends credibility to the regime and undermines and weakens the democracy movement.

What do you do?


Iranian security forces fired on anti-government protesters in the capital Sunday, killing at least four people in the fiercest clashes in months, opposition Web sites and witnesses said.

Amateur video footage purportedly from the center of Tehran showed an enraged crowd carrying away one of the casualties, chanting, “I’ll kill, I’ll kill the one who killed my brother.” In several locations in the center of the capital, demonstrators fought back furiously against security forces, hurling stones at them and setting their motorcycles, cars and vans ablaze, according to video footage and opposition Web sites.

Demonstrations also took place in at least three other cities.

In Tehran, protesters tried to cut off roads with burning barricades that filled the sky with billowing black smoke. One police officer was photographed with blood streaming down his face after he was set upon by the crowd in a blazing street.

The protests began with thousands of opposition supporters chanting “Death to the dictator,” a reference to hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as they took to the streets in defiance of official warnings of a harsh crackdown on any demonstrations coinciding with a religious observance on Sunday. Iranians were marking Ashoura, commemorating the seventh-century death in battle of one of Shiite Islam’s most beloved saints.

Meanwhile…

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday mocked U.S. President Barack Obama’s “extended hand” offer made earlier this year and said his country’s cooperation on its nuclear program had been spurned.

The U.S. president had been a disappointment to the world, Ahmadinejad said in an interview with Britain’s Channel 4 News, a full transcript of which was later posted on its website.

He once again dismissed a year-end deadline on a U.N.-drafted fuel deal, saying it was “meaningless.” The deal requires Iran to ship most of its low-enriched uranium (LEU) abroad in exchange for fuel for a Tehran research reactor.

And then there is this…

Sen. John Kerry has suggested becoming the first high-level U.S. emissary to make a public visit to Tehran since the 1979 Islamic revolution, a move White House officials say they won’t oppose.
-
Many opponents of Tehran’s regime oppose such a visit, fearing it would lend legitimacy to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at a time when his government is under continuing pressure from protests and opposition figures. Hundreds of thousands of demonstrators took to the streets again this week to voice their opposition to the government following the death of a reformist cleric.
-
“The wrong message would be sent to the Iranian people by such a high-level visit: The U.S. loves dictatorial regimes,” said Hossein Askari, a professor at George Washington University and former adviser to Iranian governments.

A trip by Sen. Kerry could provide the Obama administration a last-minute chance to directly convey its views to Iranian leaders before the U.S. moves to increase financial pressure on Tehran in an effort to derail Iran’s nuclear programs.

“Obama! Obama! Are you with us or the regime?”


10 Responses
  1. MadBrad :

    Date: December 27, 2009

    The Obama Administration is only interested in Communist Revolution. Kerry is playing the same old worn out role he has been playing since Vietnam. These people are who they always have been.

    Now that Hillary has gotten her major campaign contributors paid off she should go ahead and resign. She can claim that her authority as Secretary of State is being undermined and second guessed. That will open the door for Kerry. It would also put Mickey Mouse on notice that he will be facing a challenger from his own party in 2012. That would help slow down the political march to self destruction here. Of course the Economy will trump that.

  2. Tatersalad :

    Date: December 27, 2009

    Hey, Kid Mao and the High Maintenace First Lady are on the beach. They don’t want to be bothered with this riot stuff and what not. Community Orgainzers are just that, “organ”- izers! We have one Pathetic President that is in love with himself and the world can just wait for his next move.

  3. R.D. Walker :

    Date: December 27, 2009

  4. Tatersalad :

    Date: December 27, 2009

  5. Tatersalad :

    Date: December 27, 2009

  6. Tatersalad :

    Date: December 27, 2009

    Iran: A 5-Minute, 5-Point Reaction to The Events of Ashura
    Posted by Scott Lucas in Middle East & Iran
    This evening an Italian journalist asked me to give him four points for an article considering today’s developments in Iran. He was on a tight deadline, so I gave him five points in five minutes:

    1) This is a big victory for the opposition — they rallied in mass and, for the first time, pushed back security forces across Tehran (we are still lacking information on how much of an impact they had in other cities). The scenes of takeover of police stations, raiding of vans, fighting with (and “arresting”) Basiji, and control of streets by demonstrators are striking and without precedent in this crisis.

    2) And they did it without a major “leader” (Mousavi, Karroubi) coming out — there is a video of Khatami in crowd but no real reference to him in a leading position — or with an intervention by Rafsanjani or even a guiding voice from the senior clerics turning against the Government.

    The Latest from Iran (27 December): The Day of Ashura

    3) Regime is on back foot — confused as to whether to try and hit harder and risk mobilising opposition further or to back away. No sign of Supreme Leader or President today.

    4) For first time, I can see Government (not just President) falling and Supreme Leader having to compromise to save position.

    5) A lot depends on whether opposition can link up their show of defiance to a political agenda in next days/weeks in lead-up to anniversary of 1979 Revolution.

  7. slaphappypap :

    Date: December 27, 2009

    I could just imagine the expression on Barry and Hil’s faces if and when the people take over Tehran. It will be a total embarrassment for them.

  8. R.D. Walker :

    Date: December 27, 2009

    Nah Slap, they will just announce that “the system worked” assign themselves a “solid B+” and declare victory.

  9. R.D. Walker :

    Date: December 28, 2009

    If this is real, it is a very big deal….

    We, a number of Officers, Soldiers and personnel of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, hereby declare our readiness for rise to the armed defense of our nation against the forces of the criminal, illegitimate, transgressing and occupying current Government of Iran, and hereby inform our brothers and sisters serving with the armed security forces of Iran, invite them to join us, request their support and ask them to provide cover for us in this moral & national act. A special request for support & cooperation goes to our brothers of the Military Police.

    Our action has no political or revolting aspects. We’d rather see our actions as the carrying out of the moral & national duties of all soldiers & Iranians. Our intention is the defense of the oppressed against oppressors, and avoidance of further crimes committed by the illegitimate Government, as well as the return of freedom, peace, order & justice to our land.

  10. MadBrad :

    Date: December 28, 2009

    WOW. There’s no turning back now.

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comments are open and generally unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Real Revo. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by The Real Revo. Do Not spam this site. To help reduce spam, comments containing hyperlinks must be approved prior to appearing on the site and may be delayed. There is no need to resubmit your comment.