No matter whether this was intentional or unintentional it tosses the 7.8% statistic that Obama is touting into the toilet.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics say the California jobs numbers arrived too late to be included. According to the LA Times the jobless rate in California on September 21, 2012 was 10.6%.
ShareCalifornia has the third-highest unemployment rate, behind Nevada, which saw its jobless rate rise to 12.1% in August, and Rhode Island at 10.7%.”
Intentional. I have absolutely no faith in my current government or it’s administrators. They are crooked, malicious, evil people.
It ain’t good out here (CA) . I have several friends with small businesses and three of them don’t think they will make it through the end of the first quarter of 2013. My farmer customers are simply fighting a holding action but things in general are still declining rapidly. Expect to see several more good size cities in CA to declare bankruptcy very soon.
Anybody know what the numbers would have been with Kalifornia included?
Gallup…………. http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/10/why-gallups-chief-economist-says-the-big-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-should-be-discounted/ (see #3 below)
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/gallup-economist-jobless-rate-lacks-validity
1. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-jobless-rate-falls-7-123110106.html
2. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-500395_162-57526534/jobs-report-unemployment-rate-drops-to-7.8-percent/
3. The State that did NOT “report” its unemployment numbers to the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
California: http://lonelyconservative.com/2012/10/initial-jobless-claims-drop-when-one-large-state-does-not-report-numbers/comment-page-1/
Absolutely no evidence anywhere this is true.
And no, the link above does not say the Cal numbers were not included.
Where is Rush’s proof? It’s not like he’s above making things up.
Marko – You mean proof like this?
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1925032761001/californias-jobs-data-not-adding-up/
The jobless rate jumped (incredibly, I know) right back up to 8.2%!
Imagine that.