Was John Brown a hero or a terrorist?
May 31, 2009

As he is led to his execution, Brown pauses to kiss a black child
John Brown was an American abolitionist who advocated and practiced armed insurrection as a means to end all slavery. In 1856, he led the Pottawatomie Massacre in Bleeding Kansas.
[John Brown and his men] encamped that night between two deep ravines on the edge of the timber, some distance to the right of the main traveled road. There they remained unobserved until the following evening of May 24. Some time after dark, the party left their place of hiding and proceeded on their “secret expedition”. Late in the evening, they called at the house of James P. Doyle and ordered him and his two adult sons, William and Drury, to go with them as prisoners. (Doyle’s 16-year-old son, John, who was not a member of the pro-slavery Law and Order Party, was left with his mother.) The three men were escorted by their captors out into the darkness, where Owen Brown and one of his brothers killed them with broadswords. John Brown, Sr., did not participate in the stabbing but fired a shot into the head of the fallen James Doyle to ensure death .
Brown and his band then went to the house of Allen Wilkinson and ordered him out. He was slashed and stabbed to death by Henry Thompson and Theodore Winer, possibly with help from Brown’s sons.[4] From there, they crossed the Pottawatomie, and some time after midnight, forced their way into the cabin of James Harris at sword-point. Harris had three house guests: John S. Wightman, Jerome Glanville, and William Sherman, the brother of Henry Sherman (“Dutch Henry”), a militant pro-slavery activist. Glanville and Harris were taken outside for interrogation and asked whether they had threatened Free State settlers, aided Border Ruffians from Missouri, or participated in the sack of Lawrence. Satisfied with their answers, Brown’s men let Glanville and Harris return to the cabin. William Sherman was led to the edge of the creek and hacked to death with the swords by Brown’s sons, Winer, and Thompson.
After his death, Union soldiers marched off tho war proudly singing John Brown’s Body.
Brown has been portrayed by many as a hero. Others called him a terrorist.
- Biographer Richard Owen Boyer has called him “an American who gave his life that millions of other Americans might be free”;
- Biographer Stephen B. Oates has described him as “maligned as a demented dreamer… (but) in fact one of the most perceptive human beings of his generation”;
- Biographer David S. Reynolds gives Brown credit for starting the civil war and “killing slavery”, and cautions others against identifying Brown with terrorism. Reynolds sees him as the inspiration for the Civil Rights Movement a century later, arguing “it is misleading to identify Brown with modern terrorists.”
- Historian and Brown researcher Paul Finkelman calls him “simply part of a very violent world” and states that Brown “is a bad tactician, a bad strategist, he’s a bad planner, he’s not a very good general-but he’s not crazy”
- Biographer Louis A. DeCaro Jr., who has debunked many historical allegations about Brown’s early life and public career, concludes that although he “was hardly the only abolitionist to equate slavery with sin, his struggle against slavery was far more personal and religious than it was for many abolitionists, just as his respect and affection for black people was far more personal and religious than it was for most enemies of slavery.”
- Historian and Brown documentary scholar Louis Ruchames wrote: “Brown’s action was one of great idealism and placed him in the company of the great liberators of mankind.”;
- Biographer Otto Scott introduces his work on Brown by writing: “In the late 1850s a new type of political assassin appeared in the United States. He did not murder the mighty–but the obscure. . . . his purposes were the same as those of his classic predecessors: to force the nation into a new political pattern by creating terror.”
- Criminologist James N. Gilbert writes: “Brown’s deeds conform to contemporary definitions of terrorism, and his psychological predispositions are consistent with the terrorist model.”[33]
- Novelist Bruce Olds calls him “fanatical, … monomaniacal, … a zealot, and … psychologically unbalanced”; and finally
- Journalist Ken Chowder states he is “stubborn … egoistical, self-righteous, and sometimes deceitful; yet … at certain times, a great man”; Chowder argues that Brown has been adopted by both left and right wing, and his actions “spun” to fit the world view of the spinner at various times in American history. “[29]
- According to his autobiography, when he was asked if white people could join his black nationalist Organization of Afro-American Unity, Malcolm X replied “maybe John Brown”.
- There was also the John Brown Revolutionary League organized in 1969 in Houston, Texas and worked along The People’s Party II and MAYO as the Rainbow Coalition. Radical young groups from Black, white and Chicano backgrounds working to better their communities. Both the People’s Party II and John Brown Revolutionary League participated in an armed stand off against abusive Houston police on July 26, 1970. Carl Hampton, Chairman of the People’s Party II (later Black Panther Party) was killed in the battle. Bartee Haile, leader of the JBRL was also wounded. 400 mostly Black supporters were arrested moments after the battle ended.
This man who fought in Bleeding Kansas elicits many emotions. Some see him as a true American hero of almost saintly status. Others see him as a cold blooded killer more closely related to Timothy McVeigh. What is the truth? It is still hard to say in Bleeding Kansas.
Whatever the case, slavery was the great original sin of America and John Brown fought the evil with all he had.


R.D. Walker :
Date: May 31, 2009
In case you are wondering about the relevance of this post, let me spell it out.
Anonymous :
Date: May 31, 2009
As Ye Sow, So Shall Ye Reap.
R.D. Walker :
Date: May 31, 2009
My gut tells me that the murder of the abortionist today was a foul crime.
My gut also tells me that John Brown was an honorable man fighting against a great evil.
Finally, my gut tells me that abortion, especially late term abortion, is a crime representing as foul a stain on America as was as slavery. What George Tiller did was as evil as the crime of any slavemaster.
My gut seems to be confused. I know this however. If it turns out there is a God in heaven who judges all, I would rather stand before Him to be judged as George Tiller’s assassin than as George Tiller himself.
notamobster :
Date: May 31, 2009
all anti-abortion whackos and constitutionalist need their guns taken away, cuz 1 whackjob killed a shit doctor… the left is gonna wet their pants with this one!
James :
Date: June 1, 2009
Do you want to live in a lawless society where ends justifies means?
Civil disobedience where a person pays the penalty for their own actions can be noble – a la Henry David Thoreau. Appointing one’s self judge, jury, and executioner a la John Brown where someone else pays penalties for your actions, well, you’re an assassin.
If one embraces the concept of freedom where property rights are protected, and coercion by force is disallowed, wouldn’t it be hypocritical if your own civil disobedience violated those principles? Principles are rules of engagement to reach goals.
If your goal is to protect the unborn, then do just that.
joe buzz :
Date: June 1, 2009
I recall that JB’s crew on the way to the Armory at Harper’s Ferry killed an Afro-American on a railroad trellis. Not sure what that indicates about the cause.
Mad Brad :
Date: June 1, 2009
Then we have the humanist pervs in the media who try to make an Abortionist a Hero…
“The family said its loss “is also a loss for the city of Wichita and women across America. George dedicated his life to providing women with high-quality health care despite frequent threats and violence.”
AH YES, what about the quality healthcare he provided for all those little ladies in the womb.
Nobody needs to be sad when a murderer dies.
Roy Ryder :
Date: June 1, 2009
Like R.D. I’ve got mixed emotions about both John Brown and the murder of the abortionist. Ultimately, I go with the Law. It’s flawed, it’s abused, and it’s subjective, but it’s the best thing we’ve got. You don’t get Justice in this life, you get the Law. The law says murder is murder, regardless of whether the victim and killer are saints or sinners.
burt :
Date: June 14, 2009
Im not sure that killing an abortionist Doctor really saved the lives of any unborn, a woman who wants an abortion might be hindered but if her desire is to get rid of her child she can find a way.The real crime in all of this is, that, weomen get pregnant accidentally and then value life so little that they would rather quietly go somewhere and have that life snuffed out than suffer a little embarrasment and deliver the child and put it up for adoption.Our society perpetuates these ideas by 100s of things we do everyday that devalue life, First and foremost by calling it a fetus and not a child, tissue to be flushed or vaccumed out of a womb.. what happens in these clinics everyday is just a sanitized version of auchwitz.. a sterile assembly line of death sold for the convience and comfort of a selfish distracted society.
Michael Ejercito :
Date: October 17, 2009
Would you apply this same logic to killing drunk drivers?
Or killing the police officers who killed Pedro Navarro-Oregon?
HK :
Date: October 30, 2009
The difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter is always in the eyes of the beholder. I’ve heard it argued that from certain points of view, our American forefathers were terrorists.
To me, I think you need to put in perspective what the fight is for. I think ending the enslavement of a whole people is a noble endeavor that makes him a freedom fighter and a hero. I think killing people because they are infidels and don’t worship the way you believe God should be worshipped makes you a terrorist.
To the guy who asks if the ends justify the means, and he says, no, to me that is saying that the killing that Brown did was wrong, yet, there’s no problem with all the slaves that were killed — not just physically but mentally killed and dehumanized.
I say, yes, sometimes the ends DO justify the means. If it were possible, would I nuke millions of Germans to prevent the death of tens of millions of Jews, Slavs, Americans, Gypsies and whomever else? WIthout a doubt, YES. I have no guilt about the deaths of those that wreak evil upon others, and those that turn a cheek to those that are evil.
I think it is important for us to live lawful lives, but there are times when law not only fails us, but can be outright belligerent towards us. In those times it is possible that extreme action must be taken. It is obviously a failure of law to enslave a people. People had been trying to fix the problem, but nothing had worked. So extreme measures were taken, and I think they were justified. It’s not like back then slaves could form picket lines, stage a sit-in, protest, or petition congress. They had no rights, and by our failed system weren’t even considered people.
Adri :
Date: April 13, 2010
I’m doing a research report project in school about John Brown. Could you answer some questions for me? Thanks(:
R.D. Walker :
Date: April 13, 2010
I don’t think anybody here is an expert on John Brown, Adri, but fire away. We will see what we can come up with.
MadBrad :
Date: April 13, 2010
The Revo is becoming a resource!
Carol Adams :
Date: April 25, 2010
I am responding to the comment that was written by HK on Oct 30,2009. It has been a long time sence i have review a comment filled with so much passion. I truly wish i had the abality to express word with so much grace.