Large Scale Voter Fraud

It almost had to be. There is no other reasonable explanation.

In critical swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Illinois there are a lot of precincts in Philadelphia, Cleveland, and Chicago which reported 100% of their votes cast for Obama. These add up to many 10’s of thousands of votes for Obama and 0 for Romney. I repeat, 0 for Romney. I have read a number of articles about this and people knowlegable in Political Science and Statistics are starting to take notice of this.Statistically, even if among 10’s of thousands of voters all wanted to vote for Obama, it would not be possible to receive 100% of the vote because at least a few would make a mistake and vote incorrectly for Romney. Not to mention the fact that a least a few of those 10’s of thousands might actually disagree with Obama. These types of election returns are only seen in countries run by dictators.

Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Large Scale Voter Fraud

  1. fubar says:

    I was listening to the David Webb show on SIrius yesterday (it was a rebroadcast of earlier in the week) one of the lawyers on the Allen West Recounts called in.

    Shady dealings indeed, over 1,000 early votes “lost” – at least 3 districts in addition to West’s – where voter counting was skewed. they were talking about the integrity of the election process.
    I don’t know about anyone else, but i am finding that there isn’t anything in our society that has integrity. It’s up to us as individuals to be an example of integrity -

  2. A Guy says:

    I’d like to see another source on this because if this is true there is no doubt of shenanigans.

  3. TN-Cat says:

    Each election cycle, it seems the cheaters are getting more brazen. People are anticipating the politicians will do something about. Its apparent that is not going to happen. That leaves only the people of this country to defend the integrity of our elections.

  4. johnny gee says:

    If there was a journalist worth their salt in this country they would go to those districts and find people who voted for someone other than O.

  5. notamobster says:

    Voter fraud? Nah. Statistics-schmatistics. Barack is one-in-a-trillion. What are the chances, now. Makes no sense? Whatever dude, it’s liberal logic. 60% of the time – it works every time.

  6. Uke says:

    It doesn’t pass the smell test, that’s for sure.

    That said, I have no doubt that in many wards in Philly, it would be *ridiculously* hard to find a self-affirmed Romney supporter. Even one. Many of these wards are 100% black. Blacks went something like 95% for Obama, and I bet inner city, urban blacks went for him even more. *Virtually* 100%, I would guess.

    None of that, however, explains simple user error. Nor does it explain how even 99.99% of blacks voting for Obama means that we should have seen about 5 or 6 Romney voters out of that 59,000.

  7. Dusty says:

    Software is easy to manipulate and since an abundance of voting machine are run by software and owned by those who support BO figure out the odds of the machines being programmed to record each vote as one for BO or a system wide reset to default… (years of experience with computers from vacuum tube to present.) GIGO garbage in garbage out! Are you preparing for the reorganization? IT IS COMING.

  8. Rich says:

    The notion of a voting precinct with zero Romney votes is statistically crazy. The notion of 60 or so of such in PA plus another 40ish in Chicago begins to run into notions of statistical impossibility.

    In other words, that shit just cannot happen in reality.

    But in cyber-reality … well that’s another idea entirely.

    Was this election stolen for obama … IMAHO, yes, without doubt.

    And as to election language I have only one quibble.

    It was vote fraud, not voter fraud.

    By that I meam systemic computer generated vote fraud rather than individual voters scamming the system.

    Not that I think that individual voter fraud was absent. It was quite evident. But to sway this election required much more.

    Our best hopes? Voter ID laws and paper ballots. Maybe mechanical punch machines. But dump the computers.

  9. R.D. Walker says:

    Well, its not like Obama wouldn’t have gotten Illinois in a fair election. Chicago was a retarded place for Democratic election fraud. If the election was stolen, it was over-stolen by overzealous simpletons.

  10. EastBayLarry says:

    Common sense says “This Can’t Happen”
    But common sense has never been common and the lefties have outlawed it from their followers.

  11. Pete says:

    Yea, this is worrying because i voted for Mitt in Philly. It was a absentee ballot as I live on Fort Drum, NY. So I guess that vote did not get counted?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *