There was no intelligence failure…

Of course we all knew that.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the House intelligence committee, says the unclassified talking points put together by the CIA changed when they got to administration appointees:

“[T]here was not an intelligence failure,” Rogers told “Meet the Press” on Sunday.

“The intelligence community had it right, and they had it right early. What happened was it worked its way up through the system of the so-called talking points, which everyone refers to, and then it went up to what’s called a deputy’s committee…It went to the so-called deputy’s committee, that’s populated by appointees from the administration. That’s where the narrative changed. And so how that thing got back to (Susan) Rice, I think, is probably another question.”

What we have here, folks, is a good, old fashioned standard issue cover up.

Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to There was no intelligence failure…

  1. notamobster says:

    Cover-up for ineptitude? For sinister dealings (cia prison site)? For sending Libyan arms to Syrian rebels?


    The Obama Presidency continues unabated!

  2. R.D. Walker says:

    Hard to say but you don’t cover up happy, happy good news, do you?

  3. rj says:

    as Deputy Droopy used to say, we knew it all along… said with a syrupy southern drawl

  4. Locke n Load says:

    3 questions yet unasked by the media, the house panels, and damn near every drone you meet:
    1: wtf happened to the 20,000 missing missing surface to air missiles (reported in hearing #1) and the rest of our ‘assistance’ to the ‘rebels’ and who exactly WERE the rebels? Are they actually friendly?
    2: wtf was the ambassador doing running into Benghazi without security?
    3: WHO TOLD THE MILITARY TO STAND DOWN DAMNIT!%#w^%$ We had a SEAL marking the target, he had to be expecting air support…WHO DENIED IT AND KILLED OUR MEN?

    I am so SICK of these blasted media strawmen and salacious stories about the general. who the fuck cares! Those sthings have NOTHING to do with the real story, the real betrayal, the REAL CULPRITS and their motivations!

  5. notamobster says:

    “Those things have NOTHING to do with the real story,”

    Yeah, Locke, that’s why it’s called a cover-up… slight-of-hand, a shell game, follow the queen.

  6. Locke n Load says:

    well THANK you Captian Obvious!