Winning an election isn’t the same as winning an argument

As you all know, I still troll leftists sites. It helps keep the bayonet sharp. One thing I hear at those sites is that I need to shut up. I hear that my people and I have lost. They say that we have to succumb. That we have been vanquished. That we have been defeated and everything we stand for is in the ash heap of history. They believe that what happened on election day is winner take all and that by supporting the winner, they get to take all.

I correct them in, shall we say, the strongest terms. While the side I wanted to win lost by a small margin, it doesn’t mean that we lost the argument. It just means our candidate lost the election… barely.

Leftists seem to seem to think that losing an election means that we have to hang our heads in shame and kiss the boots of the people who won. It doesn’t, however, work that way. Jim Crow won every election in the south until the Civil Rights Movement but all that simply demonstrated was that the majority can be wrong. Jim Crow proved that winning an election doesn’t make you right.

Being in the majority is not the same as being right. The majority voting bloc in the United States gets to put their president in the White House but that doesn’t necessarily make the majority right. In fact, I believe the majority is profoundly wrong. As much as the left wishes otherwise, we are not defeated, we are not vanquished, we are not beaten and we are not giving up.

Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Winning an election isn’t the same as winning an argument

  1. MadBrad says:

    When did THEY ever shut up, hang their heads in shame and kiss the boots of the people who won.

    Never in my lifetime.

  2. jacksonsdad says:

    Yes MB… and if the results had been transposed in THIS election they would still be screaming RACIST AMERICANS from every rooftop and likely have lawsuits filed from coast to coast.

  3. Tatersalad says:

    The left wing loons won the election and very questionable at that with the fraudulent voting methods used to get to their winning goal. With that said, they now “own this economy” with this win, they voted for a loser and a losing ideology. The country will eventually implode, they own this implosion and can not but will try to blame republicans for this death spiral to the abyss.

  4. jacksonsdad says:

    I have this currently as my Desktop Background. It always makes me smile…

    http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/2012-election-county-by-county/

  5. cornbread says:

    They have the Charlie Sheen mentality. They are “winning”. We’ll see how that works out for them.

  6. MadBrad says:

    Communists never take credit for their failures. They simply blame the Counter Revolutionaries. That would be us. Never forget that.

  7. messup says:

    Secession is an alternative for a State’s (or Nation’s)citizenry, uniting and in one voice proclaiming their opposition to tyranny and tyrannical actions intended and executed by local or nationally elected officials. “Roberts Rule of Order” establishes important reasons and remedial steps that may be enacted (for example).

    A studied and orderly presentation of grievances and remedies is a democratic avenue available (to that State or Nation)for redressing any and all issues any one citizen or “citizenry” has with an overbearing, centralized government increasing exponentially its hold on any (State or) nation’s:land,labor and capital.

    Two most important questions now facing ALL American’s are: 1)has USA’s We The Elite People of culture of corruption in Washington DC usurped and overturned US’s Constitution, Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights? 2) A series of second questions follow this first one: Has USA’s We The Elite People of culture of corruption in Washington DC usurped and overturned USA’s:

    a.religious heritage,
    b.educational system,
    c. capitalistic-economical financial system and
    d. Constitutional form of governance as set forth by Our Founding Fathers?

    If the answer is yes to both the first and second series of questions, therefore sufficient grounds exist for a nation’s citizen’s and/or citizenry to present grievances (to be aired) by Constitutionally established forms, venues and forums. If the only way to present these grievances (in 2012) is a White House web page…so be it (although it is akin to writing Santa Claus….same results).

    A more logical method of addressing USA’s 50-State set of grievances (and desire to secede) is by organizing into contiguous regions. Doing so, these newly formed and organized contiguous regions stand reasonable chances of suceeding in addressing their grievances and/or possibly seceeding if their grievances aren’t satisfied. Any other way, it would be just like Don Quixote going against windmills…same outcome.

    Besides…2012′s Presidential Election was won by Democrats due to:better turnout; better organization; better use of computer techonology; better party organization at state and county levels and finally dyed-in-the-wool, fully vetted, progressive (center-left)candidates and a media blitz like no other in any Presidentai election.

    GOP’ers can replicate Democrats sucesses or devise their own…crying over spilt milk is just a call for cleaning up the mess it left behind. Pray. Amen.

  8. xenicalman says:

    To jacksonsdad:

    I checked out your desktop background and it too put a smile on my face and a new desktop background on my pc. Thank you.
    Also, what that map shows is how utterly impossible a successful internal or external “Red Dawn” scenario could ever be achieved.

  9. notamobster says:

    Yep, xenicalman, it’d be impossible for an invader to physically defeat the American people. The world’s largest army is right here, between the coasts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *