Gun Girls Beclown Morgan

Morgan really comes off as an ass. He attempts to bully the hell out of them but they won’t be bullied.

Keep smiling girls. It is very effective.

Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Gun Girls Beclown Morgan

  1. Greg B says:

    A shot gun, huh Joe?
    Bet he wouldn’t want you to have one of these:

  2. R.D. Walker says:

    The girls probably should have said they don’t have an opinion on automatic weapons.

    I challenge Morgan to fire 100 rounds a minute through a legal AR-15. I’d like to see that. I’d like to see anyone effectively fire 100 rounds a minute through a M-4. There is a reason the M-16A2 had a three round burst setting rather than a full auto setting. Full auto is pretty much uncontrollable in a light weapon for anything other than suppressive fire.

    In any case, there is no reason to believe that Lanza couldn’t have been just as effective in an elementary school with the handguns he had or grandpa’s venerable pump shotgun.

  3. Jim22 says:

    Who takes gun advice from someone like Joe Biden or Piers Morgan? No one does. This is all just political posturing. Neither one has the slightest clue about reality and neither wants to.

  4. DarthJay says:

    I’d certainly like to use the blunt end of an AR-15 to beat Piers Morgan silly…what an ass.

  5. DocO says:

    This “should automatic weapons be legal?” ploy should be answered in the following manner:

    I believe that I have to right to the same weaponry that is used to protect the president, congressional members,other politicians and wealthy individuals because the right to life is an absolute, not dependent on being a member of a privileged elite class.

    I believe I am entitled to the same weaponry as the police possess because the police will not always be available to maintain order, protect my life, the lives of my family and my property. If you doubt this please look at how well the police were able to maintain order during the Watts Riots and the Rodney King LA Riots.

    Finally, I am entitled to the same weaponry necessary to effect a first line defense against tyranny, whether its source be foreign or domestic.

    In closing, shut your gun-grabbing word hole you waste of protoplasm until you take some time to research in an unbiased fashion the subject you are pretending to be an expert on. (Yeah, dangling participle, so what.)

    • R.D. Walker says:

      Or the short version…. If the police are justified in their possession of a particular weapon for self defense, so I am I. The life of a police officer is no more worthy of protection than is mine.

  6. fasttimes says:

    So is Joe’s point that shotguns are better weapons for defense because they inflict as much or more damage and are easier to wield? What about using them on offense like in the sandy hook or aurora shootings? if the potential is there for more as much or more killing with less effort, why are they not talking about banning those as well? because it hasn’t happened with a shotgun yet? It almost seems they are not really concerned with stopping mass shootings or peoples safety

    Also, if “assault” weapons are not as effective for defense why do our police and military use them? that is curious. do these people even think about the words coming out of their mouths?

    • R.D. Walker says:

      Very good points.

      If you are looking for logic from Biden, I am afraid you are dropping your bucket down a dry well.

  7. Davis says:

    My Grandmother was a life long member of the DAR and she always told us kids growing up; “We kicked those damn people out of here for damn good reasons.” Piers is the essence of what she was talking about.